Topic: Possiblity of a total nuke war during the cold war

bulldogg · November 15th, 2005

The world would have been poisoned. The only possible positive you could wrench from this exchange would be a total lack of overpopulation now.

You don't "win" a nuclear war. So what if one side outnumbered the other and lets say for some reason only one side gets obliterated and the other is completely unscathed. Do you really believe there would be no consequences for humans if 1/7th of the planet is a radioactive wasteland?

November 15th, 2005
bulldogg Milforum's Bouncer Gear	The world would have been poisoned. The only possible positive you could wrench from this exchange would be a total lack of overpopulation now. You don't "win" a nuclear war. So what if one side outnumbered the other and lets say for some reason only one side gets obliterated and the other is completely unscathed. Do you really believe there would be no consequences for humans if 1/7th of the planet is a radioactive wasteland? __________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck