Reading post 148701 in main thread: Best and Worst Tanks of Today and Yesterday
October 10th, 2005  
Topgunjn1
 
 
Yes your right that the original Tiger tank was underpowered, but I believe the King Tiger or Tiger II with its newer power plant from Porsche. Though it is true that the King was a gas guzzler, and often was abandoned by its crews, I believe this is because the time the King came out Germany no longer possed the ability to continually supply the needs of the King. Thus the need to abandon it.

I do concede that another excellent tank was the T-34, the T-72 even in its own generation was said to have great quality production flaws.

Quote:
I don't agree with your choices. The King Tiger was unreliable, a gas guzzler and grossly underpowered. It may have been very difficult to knock out from the front and had a powerful high-velocity gun but most either broke down or were scuttled by their crews when they ran out of fuel.


If you first don\'t succeed try again! If you fail once more try another door.

2nd Calvary Regiment
\"Second Dragoons\"
Toujours Pret
 
 
(c)02-10 Military-Quotes.com - Post # 148701