Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bulldogg Designation X means what? Experimental. How much money was spent on a weapon that even in its best trials cannot compete with the USMC's old M-14? $9,000,000.00 in FY 2002 alone. How many homeless people would that feed? How many landmines would that have removed from Afghanistan? American industry has been hollowed out to the point where the US of A is the world's arms dealer. And when taken with a $7,800,000,000,000.00 government debt and personal debt ratios of the population show that fully one third are so far in debt that they cannot recover without bankruptcy you have what amounts to one huge pawnshop. Its wasteful.
The M-14 is more accurate, costs less, more deadly and more useful in hand to hand combat. Why does the government keep developing weapons? Improving on things that are better than the damn improvement? Instead of bragging about being the first country to make George Lucas's fantasy weapons come to life while millions of American children live in poverty, perhaps the populace of the USA should stop and consider the facts and ignore the hypeof governmental press releases.
IMHO.  |
What, miliions of children living in poverty? Whatever.
The M14 fires a 7.62x51mm round, thats a big round. The M14 carries only 20 rounds per mag, and is about three or four pound heavier than the M16. I myself would take the M4 over the M14.
__________________
F.O. Seaman
CAP/USAFAUX DoA/DHS
Administration Officer
Golden Armor Composite Squadron, 15077
Fort Knox, Kentucky 40121