Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PershingOfLSU The prisoners taken during the initial invasion of Afghanistan and serving in the regular Taliban military were lawful combatants and for the most part have been released.
However, many of the people in Guantanamo currently do not fall into that categorization for several reasons. First, they do not bear arms open, follow the rules of war, or wear a distinctive sign. According to the Geneva convention, since they are considered civilians commiting crimes, they can be subjected to any punishment the occupied country had on the books, before the invasion, that is permissable under the Geneva convention. As both Iraq and Afghanistan have very liberal death penaltys, a large number of the detainees could be executed as criminals. A good number could also be executed under the espionage portion of the Geneva convention. I'm not saying they should be of course, I am saying however that the Geneva convention provides for it. |
Do you have a source for this information or is it your opinion?
I think we can see from our Spanish friend's post that we can use the Geneva convention to either prove or disprove the case of unlawful/unlawful combatant for the suspected terrorists being held at Camp Delta.