118 active duty military members petition congress ...

About 118 active duty military members petition congress ... Page 2


  International Military Forums > The Off-Topic Zone > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
October 27th, 2006   #11
Senior Chief
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Infidel
I have had many opportunities to get out to include job opportunities. The only way I will get out before 22 or 24 years is 1) I die, or 2) the Army throws me out. That's the bottom line.
I don't think you'll be thrown out unless there is a MAJOR foul up!!

How long before LTC?
 
October 27th, 2006   #12
GunnyD
 
Once again, I could very easily google this for you, but I won't. There is no war in the U.S. history, that does not include members of the military refusing to fight and/or not supporting that particular war or that particular President. This is not a GW thing this is a some people are just that way thing. Knowing your history would help to keep you from making broad and general statements.
 
October 27th, 2006   #13
Donkey
 
 
Oh it is a group with an agenda....

Some quick research and a who is search comes up with the following

Quote:
Whois lookup for appealforredress.org.
NOTICE: Access to .ORG WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in
determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry
registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry
for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its
accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree
that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no
circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise
support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than
the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume,
automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of
Registry Operator or any ICANN-Accredited Registrar, except as reasonably
necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All
rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any
time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

Domain ID128489228-LROR
Domain Name:APPEALFORREDRESS.ORG
Created On:07-Sep-2006 11:37:49 UTC
Last Updated On:27-Oct-2006 17:26:40 UTC
Expiration Date:07-Sep-2007 11:37:49 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Intercosmos Media Group Inc. (R48-LROR)
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:ODN-774081
Registrant Name:Michael McPhearson
Registrant Organization:Veterans for Peace
Registrant Street1:216 S. Meramec Ave.
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:St Louis
Registrant State/Province:MO
Registrant Postal Code:63105
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.0000000000
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:admin@appealforredress.org
Admin ID:ODN-774081
Admin Name:Michael McPhearson
Admin Organization:Veterans for Peace
Admin Street1:216 S. Meramec Ave.
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:St Louis
Admin State/Province:MO
Admin Postal Code:63105
Admin Country:US
Admin Phone:+1.0000000000
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:admin@appealforredress.org
Tech ID:ODN-774081
Tech Name:Michael McPhearson
Tech Organization:Veterans for Peace
Tech Street1:216 S. Meramec Ave.
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:St Louis
Tech State/Province:MO
Tech Postal Code:63105
Tech Country:US
Tech Phone:+1.0000000000
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:admin@appealforredress.org
Name Server:NS1.LIGHTSKY.NET
Name Server:NS2.LIGHTSKY.NET
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
A google search of the owners name shows this...
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/resourc...s20040309.html

Just providing some information on the information

-edit

I have a problem with this statement
Quote:
Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) is a group of veterans who have served since September 11, 2001 including Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. We are committed to saving lives and ending the violence in Iraq by an immediate withdrawal of all occupying forces. We also believe that the governments that sponsored these wars are indebted to the men and women who were forced to fight them and must give their Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, and Airmen the benefits that are owed to them upon their return home.
The problem I have is with the term FORCE, last time I checked you signed up for the military in the USA and if you thought you would just get a 4 year ride doing training you must be crazy...

I have the utmost repesect for our soldiers and feel they should be treated far better then some hollywood celeberity, however they did choose to be a US Soldier...

Last edited by Donkey; October 27th, 2006 at 17:44..
 
October 27th, 2006   #14
GunnyD
 
Donkey, this is how its supposed to be, question everything and find out what the source is. Good job.
 
October 27th, 2006   #15
Missileer
 
 
Two years at hard labor and a dishonorable discharge. And I think something like this is too close to treason to take a chance.





“War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.”
—John Stuart Mill
 
October 27th, 2006   #16
Chief Bones
 
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Missileer
Two years at hard labor and a dishonorable discharge. And I think something like this is too close to treason to take a chance.
I could buy the Dishonorable Discharge, I could buy time at hard labor - I am not sure about treason.

Supposedly, these individuals are military members that have already served in Iraq ......... (Don't quote me as being 100% right - just remember reading something about this that leads me to believe it were so).

I believe that they received bad legal advice, and thought Appeal of Redress was the way to go, to make their honest opinions and voices heard, where they couldn't be muzzled.

I have already stated "I consider this to be a clear violation of the oath they took at the time of their induction, and a clear break in the faith placed in them by all Americans."


It requires further investigation by military legal investigators - if it is as we believe - 100% illegal, then Courts Martial is called for where these 118 military members are concerned.
 
October 27th, 2006   #17
Missileer
 
 
Each case needs to be looked at individually. There are always some coerced and those who just follow the crowd.
 
October 28th, 2006   #18
GunnyD
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Bones
I could buy the Dishonorable Discharge, I could buy time at hard labor - I am not sure about treason.

Supposedly, these individuals are military members that have already served in Iraq ......... (Don't quote me as being 100% right - just remember reading something about this that leads me to believe it were so).

I believe that they received bad legal advice, and thought Appeal of Redress was the way to go, to make their honest opinions and voices heard, where they couldn't be muzzled.

I have already stated "I consider this to be a clear violation of the oath they took at the time of their induction, and a clear break in the faith placed in them by all Americans."


It requires further investigation by military legal investigators - if it is as we believe - 100% illegal, then Courts Martial is called for where these 118 military members are concerned.


Saying that they served in Iraq, may impress civilians, but it doesnt wash with me. Where and in what capacity would make a huge difference on how I viewed their opinions.

In that same venue, that fact that you are clearly against the administration and the war, but still clearly state that you dont like what they are doing, makes my respect for you higher( not that you give a rats a** what I think of you Chief)

I am pretty sure that speaking out against the CiC whilst in uniform is a UCMJ nono, and i hope they get there peepees smacked for it.

Last edited by Missileer; October 28th, 2006 at 19:02..
 
October 28th, 2006   #19
major liability
 
 
Dishonorable discharge for being and we're done here.

I agree with them, but when you sign up, you make a commitment that you can't break and I respect that.


"Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government." - George Washington

Last edited by Missileer; October 28th, 2006 at 19:03..
 
October 28th, 2006   #20
Missileer
 
 
Gunny and major, watch the language.
 



Similar Topics
Next US President
US Military Members
Question about deceased military members abroad.
Veteran sues after he receives duty order
Hope this truth gets out